Shashi Bhushan Singh And ORS v. The Chairman Of National Highways Authority Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6534 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.
Shashi Bhushan Singh, Son of Shree Jaleshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Gobar, Sahi Dumri, Road, Police Station- Sadar, DistrictMuzaffarpur. 2.
Nitu Singh, Wife of Shashi Bhushan Singh.
3.
Jaleshwar Prasad Singh, Son of Late Jantri Prasad Singh 4.
Lakshman Mahato, Son of Late Yadu Nandan Mahto, All are Resident of Village- Pakri Ismail, Post Officer- Ladaura Pakri, Police Station- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Chairman Of National Highways Authority Of India 65 & 6 Sector, 10 Dawarka, New Delhi-110075 2.
The Secretary Department of Road Transport and Highway, Government of India.
3.
Chief General Manager Tech, National Highway Authority of India. 4.
General Manager National Highway Authority of India. null null 5.
Manager Technical, National Highway Authority of India, at Muzaffarpur. 6.
The Regional Officer, National Highway Authority of India, D- 63, First Floor Rajesh Kumar Path Sri Krishnapuri, Boring Road, Patna-1. 7.
The State of Bihar through the Collector Muzaffarpur, District Muzaffarpur. 8.
The District Land Acquisition Officer, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md. Helal Ahmad, Advocate Mr. Naushad Akhtar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam,AAG-12 Ms. Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead the District Land Acquisition Officer, Muzaffarpur as respondent no. 8 in the course of the day.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this
Patna High Court CWJC No.6534 of 2017(2) dt.18-11-2024 2/2 case may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh representation before the District Land Acquisition Officer, Muzaffarpur, for redressal of their grievance.
4. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners.
5. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, this case is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh representation before the District Land Acquisition Officer, Muzaffarpur, within a period of four weeks and on filing the same within the said period the Authority shall decide the matter expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U