Pappu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3102 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-175 Year-2021 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Pappu Rai Son Of Shankar Rai R/V- Manpur, P.S- Lalganj,Dist-Vaishali 2.

Dablu Rai Son Of Shankar Rai R/V- Manpur, P.S- Lalganj,Dist-Vaishali 3.

Mukesh Rai Son Of Late Maheshwar Rai R/V- Manpur, P.S- Lalganj,DistVaishali 4.

Sanjay Rai Son Of Late Baidhnath Rai @ Vaidyanath Ray R/V- Manpur, P.S- Lalganj,Dist-Vaishali 5.

Sonu Rai Son Of Hemant Rai R/V- Manpur, P.S- Lalganj,Dist-Vaishali 6.

Lalan Rai Son Of Late Madan Rai R/V- Manpur, P.S- Lalganj,Dist-Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bela Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 436, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, the petitioners along with 20-25 persons came at the house of the informant, armed with deadly weapons surrounded the informant and assaulted the informant and his family members.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3102 of 2023(2) dt.28-03-2023 2/2 levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He further submits that from perusal of the impugned order it is mentioned that the persons were injured but nature of injury was not mentioned in the impugned order. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is case and counter case between the parties, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 175 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T