Aniket Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1012 of 2022 ====================================================== Aniket Kumar son of Late Aditya Kumar Singh @ Aditya Kumar, Resident of Mohalla-MIG Sector-06, Block-07, Flat No.-234, Bhootnath Road, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Patna-26, Police Station-Kankarbagh in the District of Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Compassionate Appointment Committee through its Chairmancum-District Magistrate, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Patna. 5.

The District Education Officer, Patna.

6.

The District Program Officer (Establishment), Patna. 7.

The Chief Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. 8.

The Municipal Secretary-cum-Authorised Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kr. Roy 1, S.C.-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The present writ application has been filed for the following reliefs:

(i) To direct the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground as his father died in harness on 13.02.2020 when he was posted as clerk in Lokeshwari Women High School Kadam

Patna High Court CWJC No.1012 of 2022(7) dt.27-01-2025 2/2 Kuanya, Patna.

(ii) Also to direct the respondents to appoints the petitioner on compassionate ground as per the existing Rule as his father died in harness during posting tenure as clerk.

(iii) Also for any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is found to be entitled in the eye of law. 3.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through the prayer made in this writ application, I direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation within two weeks before the respondent no.7 and respondent no.7 would be obliged to pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within one month thereafter.

4.

It is made clear that respondent no. 7 shall be solely liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period. 5.

With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) priyanka/- U