Hare Ram Jha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3698 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- KALUAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Hare Ram Jha Son of Late Ghuran Jha Resident of Village- Kalikapur, P.S.- Kaluahi, District - Madhubani 2.
Lalit Kumar Jha Son of Chandra Kant Jha Resident of Village- Kalikapur, P.S.-Kaluahi, District - Madhubani 3.
Chandra Kant Jha Son of Late Ghuran Jha Resident of Village- Kalikapur, P.S.-Kaluahi, District - Madhubani 4.
Mahi Kant Jha @ Mohikant Jha Son of Late Ghuran Jha Resident of VillageKalikapur, P.S.-Kaluahi, District - Madhubani 5.
Rajeev Kumar Jha @ Raju Jha @ Raju Kumar Jha Son of Chandra Kant Jha. Resident of Village- Kalikapur, P.S.-Kaluahi, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Kaluahi P.S. Case no. 122 of 2025 registered under section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that after the death of the husband of the sister of the informant followed by her father-in-law, the accused persons who are the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3698 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/3 brother-in-laws and nephews denied to give any share in the ancestral property to the informant's sister who was issueless. She was finally done to death by poisoning by Kamal Jha and his wife Beena Devi.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. The allegations levelled in the FIR are false and concocted. Kamal Jha and his wife Beena Devi are not the petitioners herein. The petitioners undertake to cooperate in the investigation/trial.
5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioners in the F.I.R. and the specific allegation of poisoning of the informant's sister being on Kamal Jha and his wife Beena Devi who are not the petitioners herein, in the facts of the case, it is directed that all the five petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Kaluahi P.S. Case no. 122 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3698 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 3/3 satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Madhubani.
(Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/- U T