← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/71/2019disposed

Abdul Kuddus v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-17Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.71 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10308 of 2018 ====================================================== Abdul Kuddus, son of Shekh Asiruddin, Resident of Simalbari (Banbari), Ward No. -11, Police Station- Baisi, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Food And Consumer Protection Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna namely Sri Pankaj Kumar.

2. The Collector, Purnea namely Sri Pradeep Kumar Jha.

3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baisi Purnea namely Sri Sawan Kumar.

4. The Block Supply Officer, Baisi, Purnea namely Sri Suresh Kumar Mandal. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.S. Raza Ahmad - Aag 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 17-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioner has filed the present contempt application for compliance of the order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 10308 of 2018 dated 03.08.2018.

Learned counsel for the State on behalf of the opposite party nos. 2, 3 and 4 has filed a show cause wherein the order passed by the Collector dated 29.01.2019 has been annexed as Annexure-A being the order disposing of the Supply Appeal Case No. 21 of 2018.

Counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has not shown any inclination in appearing before the Appellate

Patna High Court MJC No.71 of 2019(3) dt.17-04-2019 2/2 Court in Appeal and had remained absent, hence, the appeal has been disposed of as the petitioner remained absent and was not inclined to proceed with the appeal.

Considering the same, the order passed in the writ application has been substantially complied with. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order passed by the appellate court in Supply Appeal Case No. 21 of 2018.

Contempt application is accordingly, disposed of. (Nilu Agrawal, J) devendra/- U