← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3300/2018disposed

Sonamati Kumari @ Sanamati Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-03-13Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3300 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23467 of 2011 ====================================================== Sonamati Kumari @ Sanamati Kumari, Daughter of Vidya Singh, Wife of Vir Bahadur Singh, Resident of Village-Bahiro Ara, District- Bhojpur, at present working as a Teacher in Prathmic Vidyalaya Kolari Tola, Koura Gram Panchayat Kaura, P.S. Jagdishpur, Block- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The District Teachers Employment, Appellate Authority, Bhojpur. 3.

The District Programme Officer, Bhojpur.

4.

The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Kaura, P.O. and Block- Jagdishpur, Distt. Bhojpur.

5.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Kaura, P.O. and Block Barhat, Distt. Jamui. 6.

Md. Jamaluddin, S/o Mahamadin Ali, resident of Muhalla Begampur, Post Ara, Thana Ara Nagar, Distt. Bhojpur.

... ... Respondents/Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, A.A.G. 15.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

The present application has been filed for modification of order dated 20.11.2017 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 23467 of 2011 by which the writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority against the order dated 20.10.2011 passed by the Member, District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Bhojpur, within a period of thirty days from the date

Patna High Court MJC No.3300 of 2018(2) dt.13-03-2019 2/2 of order i.e. 20.11.2017.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to some unavoidable reasons, she could not prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority. Hence, she prays for further thirty days time to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority.

Considering the grounds mentioned in the application, the petitioner is granted further thirty days time to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority from today. The order dated 20.11.2017 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 23467 of 2011 stands modified to the extent as indicated above. The modification application is, accordingly, allowed. (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U