← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6748/2026allowed

Randhir Kumar @ Bhuwar @ Buar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-10Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6748 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-242 Year-2025 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran ====================================================== Randhir Kumar @ Bhuwar @ Buar, S/o Gopal Rai, R/o Village - Ramdaspur Moriya, P.S. - Panapur, District - Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Avinash Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 242 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 132, 109 and 3(5) of B.N.S. and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with one other was on a bike and has made firing on the police. In self defense, police also made firing and one of the bullet hit the right leg of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that though the allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6748 of 2026(2) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 against the petitioner is that he has made firing on police but the F.I.R. itself goes to show that police has made firing on him because he has received the injuries. There is only allegation against the petitioner that he has made firing on police but no police personnel has received any injury. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 05.08.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of six cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 242 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T