Amrendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6834 of 2016 (3) dt.08-04-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6834 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -68 Year- 2015 Thana -SHYAMPUR BHATHA District- SHEOHAR ======================================================

1. Amrendra Ram, Son of Birja Ram, Resident of Village- Bahuara, P.S. Shyampur Bhatha, District- Sheohar..... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kr.Singh 1(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Shyampur Bhatha P.S. Case No. 68 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 385 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, from the informant working as Nazir in Dumri Katsari Block ransom of Rs. 2,00,000/- was demanded through mobile and again on refusal ransom of Rs. 50,000/- was demanded and then the informant told the caller to pay only Rs. 25,000/- and then the informant was called at Mushari Market. During investigation on the basis of call details of the said mobile of the caller it revealed that SIM which was used for demanding ransom was used in the mobile of the petitioner. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, no amount of ransom was paid and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6834 of 2016 (3) dt.08-04-2016 the petitioner is suffering in custody since 11.12.2015 and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration to which learned APP opposes.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Sheohar in connection with Shyampur Bhatha P.S. Case No. 68 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T