← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6165/2016rejected

Sanjoy Sahini @ Sanjay Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2016-04-06Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6165 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -259 Year- 2015 Thana -JAMUI District- JAMUI ====================================================== Sanjoy Sahini @ Sanjay Sahani son of Nandlal Sahani, resident of villageBalgudar, P.S.- Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under section 25(1-b)A/26/35 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, after search from possession of the petitioner, four loaded country made Kattas (fire arm) were recovered.

Submission is of false implication and that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner, he has been made victim of the circumstances. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned A.P.P. seriously opposes. In the facts and circumstances stated above,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6165 of 2016 (3) dt.06-04-2016 2/2 considering the alleged recovery of four country made Kattas loaded with cartridges, at present, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, accordingly, his such prayer in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No.259 of 2015 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui stands rejected. However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within six months after taking the same on priority basis, failing which the petitioner may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) N.H./- U T