← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4502/2026dismissed

Narayan Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-12Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4502 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-346 Year-2024 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Narayan Chaudhary S/o- Munni Chaudhary R/v- Vaniyadih, Banidih PoSrirampur Ps- Sherghati Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bishweshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Sherghati P.S.Case No. 346 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 19.02.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 8697 of 2025, which reads as under:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sherghati P.S.Case No.346 of 2024 registered for the offence under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4502 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026 2/2 the petitioner is accused of killing his own daughter by cutting her neck. He has given self inclupatory statement.

4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in jail since 27.06.2024.

5. Considering the allegation levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge has been framed.

5. Considering the gravity of heinous nature of offence and the fact that the trial has started, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

7. The Trial court is directed to expedite the trial at the earliest.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) N.K/- U