Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6618/2016bail granted

Sanjay Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-26Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6618 of 2016 (2) dt.26-02-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6618 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -286 Year- 2012 Thana -RUNISAIDPUR District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Sanjay Manjhi son of Ramjee Manjhi, resident of village- Subhaigarh, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 26-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 286 of 2012 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 384, 386, 387, 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-B)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act, Sections 3 /4 Explosive Substance Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act.

The petitioner was not caught at the spot and it is submitted that nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession, his name was taken by co-accused Pramod Mahto and Luxman Mahto and he is suffering in custody since 21.09.2015 whereas Pramod Mahto, Luxman Mahto and Shiv Sahani and Suhag Paswan have already been allowed bail by different Benches of this Court to which learned APP does not dispute.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6618 of 2016 (2) dt.26-02-2016 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. Case No. 286 of 2012, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T