← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3192/2022bail granted

Sanjay Sao @ Bhola Thathera v. The State Of Bihar

2022-05-26Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3192 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-390 Year-2020 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== SANJAY SAO @ BHOLA THATHERA S/o - Late Munna Prasad R/o- Sakari Gali Gowal Toli, P.S. - Alamganj, Distt. - Patna. At present - In the house of Late Prakash Sao, Beldar tola, Bela Bazar, P.S. - Bela, Distt. - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nityanand Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suresh Prasad Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No. 390 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 356 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 12.07.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and has antecedent of ten cases and the informant alleges that while she was purchasing flower for worship when two criminals came on a motorcycle and snatched her gold chain weighing 15 grams.

The learned counsel submits that the FIR was against unknown, it is next submitted that petitioner was arrested in Alamganj P.S. Case No. 766 of 2020 in which he was made to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3192 of 2022(2) dt.26-05-2022 2/2 confess his participation in the present crime, it is next submitted that confession in police custody does not have any evidentiary value, more so, when there is no recovery nor petitioner was put on TIP. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case because of his antecedents.

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 12.07.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No. 390 of 2020 with a condition that one of the bailor of the petitioner shall be his wife Urmila Devi. (Satyavrat Verma, J) shahzad/- U T