Md. Sartaj v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6110 of 2017 ====================================================== Md. Sartaj son of Md. Harun resident of Jalai Paschim Puranwas, Panchayat - Manowar, P.S. - Mahisi Jalai, Block - Mahishi, District - Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Patna 2.

The Commissioner, Koshi Division at Saharsa.

3.

The District Magistrate, Saharsa.

4.

The Director, District Rural Development Agency, Saharsa. 5.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Saharsa. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Block Mahishi, District - Saharsa. 7.

The Executive Engineer, National Rural Employment Programme, Saharsa. 8.

The Assistant Engineer, National Rural Employment Programme, Saharsa. 9.

The Junior Engineer, National Rural Employment Programme, Saharsa. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nafisuzzoha For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vikash Kumar-Sc11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 27-02-2020 The petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the concerned respondents to make available to him an amount of Rs. 6,88,960/- which is due to him for having constructed a boundary wall in the graveyard situated in village Jalai Paschim Puranwas, under Manowar Panchayat, in the district of Saharsa.

It has been submitted that the work with the approved estimate of Rs. 8,43,300/- was entrusted to the petitioner. The petitioner has completed the work but for

Patna High Court CWJC No.6110 of 2017 dt.27-02-2020 2/2 no apparent good reason, the balance payment of the aforestated amount is not being made.

On the suitable representation being filed by the petitioner before respondent no. 3/District Magistrate, Saharsa within a period of two weeks, the concerned respondent shall look into the matter, verify the records, ascertain the payability of the claim made by the petitioner and shall pass orders in accordance with law within a period of four weeks of the receipt of such representation. If the claim of the petitioner is found to be tenable, necessary arrangement shall be made for making payment of the aforesaid balance amount at the earliest. With the aforesaid direction/observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) krishna/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 28.02.2020 Transmission Date