← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./290/2019dismissed

Janardan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-31Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.290 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-580 Year-2018 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Janardan Singh Son of Late Lakhan Singh Resident of Village - Salauna Chak, P.S.- Lakhisarai, District - Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Krishna Prasad Singh, Senior Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2019 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Lakhisarai P.S.Case No. 580 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 385, 307, 387, 341, 323, 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code Allegation as per F.I.R. is of demand of Rs. Five lacs as ransom for construction of the house and the petitioner is an accused in six other cases out of which in four cases the petitioner is on bail and in two cases the petitioner has been acquitted after trial.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case and the petitioner is neighbor of the informant having common boundry wall and there is dispute over extention of Chajja and the Nagar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.290 of 2019(3) dt.31-01-2019 2/2 Parishad had already measured the land and permitted to extend the Chajja about 5 feet.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances as discussed above, the case of the petitioner is concerned, he is an accused in six other cases, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, Accordingly, prayer of anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to the petitioner that if the petitioner surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of order and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of this Court.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/- U T