Md. Sharfuddin @ Md. Sarfuddin Shah @ Sarfuddin v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8472 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2023 Thana- WAJIRGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Md. Sharfuddin @ Md. Sarfuddin Shah @ Sarfuddin Son Of Md. Sattar Shahadat R/O Village- Barosar, P.S.- Miskaur, Dist.- Navada ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Murad Ashraf, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Wajirganj P.S. Case No. 143 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant due to non fulfillment of further dowry demand.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submitted that petitioner is the Brother-in-law of the deceased and has no concern with mess
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8472 of 2024(3) dt.14-05-2024 2/2 and business of the deceased as well as her husband. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the FIR and there is specific allegation of killing the informant's daughter is against the petitioner and other co-accused. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the seriousness of the allegation and the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. The prayer is rejected.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Arish/- U T