Ramdeep Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.279 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2021 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Ramdeep Singh S/o- Anant Singh Village- Kathiaundh PS-Fatehpur DisttGaya 2.
Ravindra Singh S/o- Late Bhagwat Singh Village- Kathiaundh PS-Fatehpur Distt- Gaya 3.
Kumar Sanu @ Sonu Singh S/o- Ravindra Singh Village- Kathiaundh PSFatehpur Distt- Gaya 4.
Sarth Kumar @ Shankar Singh S/o- Dayanand Singh Village- Kathiaundh PS-Fatehpur Distt- Gaya ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Mira Devi W/o- Manoj Das Village- Kathiaundh PS-Fatehpur Distt- Gaya ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellants :
Ms. Sonam Kumari, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl.PP For the Informant :
Mr. Dharmesh Kumar Chaubey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned Spl.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. This appeal has been filed for setting aside order dated 12.11.2024 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Gaya in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 452, 354 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(r)(s)(z) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of these
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.279 of 2025(6) dt.29-01-2026 2/2 appellants has been rejected.
3. At the outset, it is submitted by learned Spl.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant that the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to these appellants is not maintainable as from bare perusal of Paragraph No. 4 of the supplementary-affidavit filed on behalf of the appellants, it is apparent that cognizance has already been taken by the learned trial court for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. In this regard, reliance is placed in the case of Bachu Das Vs. State of Bihar and others, reported in (2014) 3 Supreme Court Cases 471.
4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and pronouncement of law rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bachu Das (supra), appellants' prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail is rejected and this appeal stands dismissed. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T