Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6059/2016bail granted

Chandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-24Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6059 of 2016 (2) dt.24-02-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6059 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -290 Year- 2015 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Chandan Yadav son of Mahesh Yadav Resident of village - Jhaur, Police Station - Sherghati, District - Gaya..... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 290 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, three persons were talking in suspicion condition and then the Police personnel went there but one succeeded in fleeing away and two persons including the petitioner were caught but from possession of the petitioner nothing was recovered.

Submission is of false implication and that he has been made victim of circumstances, without any recovery he is suffering in custody since 04.11.2015 and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration to which learned APP does not oppose.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6059 of 2016 (2) dt.24-02-2016 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 290 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T