Durg Ram @ Durga Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2048 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2025 Thana- DOBHI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Durg Ram @ Durga Ram Son of Mota Ram @ Moda Ram Resident of Village - Ratasar, Chokhala, P.S.- Nagana, District - Barmer (Rajasthan). 2.

Bhanwar Lal Son of Mohan Lal Resident of Village - Ratasar, Chokhala, P.S.- Nagana, District - Barmer (Rajasthan).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Dobhi PS Case No. 270 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a), 32(i), 32(ii), 36, 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 1188 liters of foreign liquor was recovered from the pick-up vehicle and the petitioner was arrested on the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2048 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026 2/2 counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are the driver and co-driver and they have no knowledge regarding the nature of goods kept in the vehicle. The petitioners are in custody since 13.10.2025 and have got clean criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Dobhi PS Case No. 270 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioners.

(II) The petitioners shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Siddharth Soni/- U T