Ramjeevan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5997 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -805 Year- 2015 Thana -BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Ramjeevan Yadav, Son of Late Chhedi Yadav, Resident of MohallaMaharaj Ghat Road, Bari Khanjarpur, P.S.- Barari, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kotwali(Barari) P.S. Case No. 805 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, Manorma Devi the daughter of the informant was married to Shambhu Yadav the son of the petitioner 5 years ago and due to non fulfillment of demand of Rs. 1,00,000/- to do business the petitioner and other co-accused killed her. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is living separately from the deceased and her husband, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner rather the allegation is general and omnibus in nature, only with a view to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5997 of 2016 (2) dt.19-02-2016 2/2 extract money the entire family members have been implicated, the husband of the deceased is also in jail custody and as such the petitioner who is suffering in custody since 12.12.2015 deserves sympathetic consideration to which learned A.P.P. duly assisted by learned counsel for the informant opposes by submitting that the hand of the deceased was found fractured. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that the petitioner is father-in-law, the husband is already in custody and as such the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned C.J.M., Bhagalpur, in connection with Kotwali (Barari) P.S. Case No.

805 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) siddharth/- U T