Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6127/2016bail granted

Ranjeet Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-24Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6127 of 2016 (2) dt.24-02-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6127 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -79 Year- 2015 Thana -BHAGALPUR GRP CASE DistrictBHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Ranjeet Mandal Son of Lakshman Mandal Resident of village - Ghogha Mirjapur, P.S. Kahalgaon, District - Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... ............................... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. B.Ram(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhagalpur Rail P.S. Case No. 79 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, mobile and cash of Rs. 600/- were stolen away from the purse of the informant and the petitioner was caught and from his possession mobile and cash were recovered. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has been made victim of circumstances, now, he by remaining in custody since 05.10.2015 has sufficiently been penalized to which learned APP opposes.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of detention, the petitioner above named is directed to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6127 of 2016 (2) dt.24-02-2016 be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with Bhagalpur Rail P.S. Case No. 79 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T