Md Mohiuddin @ Tarzan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3576 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-346 Year-2025 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Md Mohiuddin @ Tarzan Son of Md Sahmsuddin Resident of Village - New Azimabad Colony Sector - 'A', P.S. - Bahadurpur, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shakil Ahmad Khan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 346 of 2025, dated 23.10.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section/s 25(1-B)(a), 26 of the Arms Act and Section 4/5 of the Explosive Substance Act.

3. As per prosecution case, the police has recovered an empty magazine, small pointed pieces of iron, kept in plastic container, as well as 300 grams of chemical explosive like fertilizer from the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from the seizure list, it appears that no arms or explosive materials were recovered, while one empty magazine including some iron pieces, kept in a plastic, as well as 300 grams of fertilizer are

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3576 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/3 said to have been seized from the abandoned shed, which is away from his main living areas and an open place. It is next submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent and the fertilizer, which is said to have been recovered, was actually kept for agricultural purposes but, for ulterior reason, the name of the petitioner has been dragged in the instant case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent and is ready to cooperate with the investigation. Counsel for the petitioner finally submits that no case under the Arms Act is made out against the petitioner.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the submissions made by the parties as also the petitioner, being a person of clean antecedent, this Court is inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Civil Court,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3576 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 3/3 Patna City in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 346 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U T