Ravindra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4646 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-468 Year-2023 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
Ravindra Yadav SON OF Late Bhola Yadav VILLAGE - CHIRI BHARATHU P.S. -GHOSI, DISTRICT - JEHANABAD 2.
KABINDRA YADAV SON OF LATE BHOLA YADAV VILLAGE - CHIRI BHARATHU P.S. -GHOSI, DISTRICT - JEHANABAD 3.
SATENDRA YADAV @ SATYENDRA YADAV SON OF RAJO YADAV VILLAGE - CHIRI BHARATHU P.S. -GHOSI, DISTRICT - JEHANABAD ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shyamal Prakash, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 17-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354(B), 379, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegedly, all the accused persons including the petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant's side brutally and petitioner no.1 tried to outrage the modesty of the informant's Gotani as well.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4646 of 2024(2) dt.17-02-2024 2/2 allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Both the parties are agnates and there is admitted land dispute between them. Though there is allegation against the petitioners to assault the informant's side brutally, but as per the injury report, injuries of the injured persons are simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as the injuries of the injured persons are simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Ghosi P.S. Case No. 468 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T