Sunil Kumar Dubey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4637 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-317 Year-2018 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== SUNIL KUMAR DUBEY SON OF SHRI HARE GOVIND DUBEY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - LAHANA, P.O. - KANJHARUA, P.S. - KORANSARAI, DISTRICT - BUXAR ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
ANANT JEE TIWARY SON OF SHRI PARAS NATH TIWARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - MANOHARPUR, P.O. - MEDINIPUR, P.S. - DINARA, DISTRICT - ROHTAS (BIHAR) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pathak, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP Mr. Surendra Kr. Singh, Adv.OP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P for the State and learned counsel for opp.party no. 2.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a complaint case punishable for offence under Sections 420, 468, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The complaint petition has been filed against six accused persons including petitioner stating therein this petitioner under a conspiracy cheated the complainant and took Rs. 2,60,000/- in lieu of providing job to son of complainant in Railway Group 'D' Service and sent forged appointment letter and permanent posting letter.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4637 of 2024(11) dt.15-01-2025 2/2
4. In this case, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of complainant wherein it is stated that petitioner has made a false statement in paragraph - 3 of the petition that petitioner has got clean antecedent, whereas petitioner has got three criminal antecedent of similar nature, vide Complaint Case No. 657 of 2017, Complaint Case No. 658 of 2017 and Complaint Case No. 05 of 2018 respectively.
5. Considering the nature of accusation and criminal antecedent, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T