Rama Nath Jha Shashi @ Ramnath Jha Shashi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.851 of 2020 ====================================================== Rama Nath Jha Shashi @ Ramnath Jha Shashi son of Late Ghatai Jha, resident of Village- Barsam, P.s.- Rudrapur, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Education Officer, Madhubani.

5.

The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Madhubani. 6.

The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

7.

The Treasury Officer, Jhanjharpur, District- Madhubani. 8.

The In-Charge Head Master, Chandeshwar plus2 High School, harari, P.S.- Rudrapur, District- Madhubani.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Baleshwar Kamat, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Ms. Shilpa Singh (GA12) For Accountant General : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 05-10-2020 As of now the Courts have not resumed normal physical hearing, the matter has been listed today for consideration through Video Conferencing.

The learned counsels are appearing and making submissions from their residence. The Court Master and Secretary are also part of this virtual court proceedings from their homes, all with the aid of audio visual technology.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State as also the learned Counsel appearing for the

Patna High Court CWJC No.851 of 2020(9) dt.05-10-2020 2/2 Accountant General.

The admitted position that emerges in today's proceeding is that admitted retiral dues of the petitioner have been paid. Deductions however have been effected by the authorities. Learned Counsel for the petitioner further submits that for the late payment he is entitled to interest.

This Court would only observe that since the writ petition was for payment of retiral dues and the same has been paid, this Court is not inclined to go into the deductions which have been made from the dues. The petitioner would be at liberty to take appropriate steps for redressal of his grievance in respect of the deductions after examining whether the same are due or undue.

This order is being passed in presence of learned Counsel for the Accountant General.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U