← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2587/2024dismissed

Sulochana Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-14Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2587 of 2024 ====================================================== Sulochana Devi W/o Birendra Kumar Yadav, Resident of village - Mahua, P.S. - Nirmali, District - Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Service, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Divisional Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa. 4.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Supaul. 5.

The District Programme Officer, Supaul.

6.

The Child Development Project Officer, Nirmali, Supaul. 7.

The Lady Supervisor, Nirmali, Supaul.

8.

Archana Kumari, Wife of Rabindra Kumar Yadav, Resident of Ward No. 2, Majhari, P.S. - Nirmali, District - Supaul.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjay Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, AC to GP-22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 14-03-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(i). To issue an appropriate order/s, direction/s including a writ preferably in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated31.10.2023 passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa in Anganwari Revision Case No. 23/2020 and Revision Case No. 83/2020 filed by the respondent, whereby and whereunder he has allowed the case on wrong ground.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2587 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 2/2 (ii). To direct the respondent no. 7 to reinstate the petitioner to the post of Anganwadi Sevika in the Anganwari Centre No. 92, Panchayat, Majhari, Nirmali, District- Supaul."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U