Deepak Singh @ Deepak Kumar Prasad @ Deepak Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4550 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2025 Thana- HARLAKHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Deepak Singh @ Deepak Kumar Prasad @ Deepak Kumar Singh, Son of Ram Bahadur Mahto @ Ram Bahadur Singh@ Ram Bahadur Prasad Singh, R/o village - Pipraun , P.S. - Harlakhi, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Advocate Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Harlakhi P.S. Case No. 16 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the possession of one Md. Salamat Darji, altogether 10 bottles (100 ml each) of Triprolidine Hydrochoride and Codeine Phosphat Cough Syrup, 20 bottles (100 ml each) of Cough Linctus Cough Syrup, 59 tablets of Nitrazepam IP-10MG and 48 capsule of SpasmoProxyvon Plus were recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. His name was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4550 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026 2/2 disclosed by co-accused Md. Salamat Darji who has stated that he was carrying all this to the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. The recovery has been made from the possession of Md. Salamat Darji and he has named this petitioner in this case without any basis. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 11.12.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases of similar nature.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.-IV, Madhubani in connection with Harlakhi P.S. Case No.16 of 2025 with the condition that petitioner shall not indulge in similar nature of offence in future.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T