Mukesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 1735 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-256 Year-2019 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== MUKESH YADAV Son of Naru Yadav Resident of Village - Shevtar, Police Station - Atri, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Accused persons assaulted informant's son by fist and danda when he demanded fare of his Auto service. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and the opinion on the injury has been reserved by the doctor. Nothing incriminating has come against the petitioner during investigation.

Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 1735 of 2020(2) dt.25-02-2020 2/2 below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate XIII, Gaya in Atri Police Station Case No. 256 of 2019 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T