Md. Seraj Ansari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3171 of 2018 ====================================================== Md. Seraj Ansari, S/O Late Md. Samsuddin Ansari, Resident of Tufani Sai Ki Gali, Ward No. 8, P.S. Dumroan, District Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar, through its Principal Secretary, Department of Registration, Govt. of Bihar Patna.
2. The Inspector General, Registration, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Assistant Inspector General, Registration, Patna.
4. The Collector - cum - District Registrar, Buxar.
5. The Sub-Registrar, Buxar.
6. Akramuddin Khan, S/o Salauddin Khan, Resident of Goshala Road Dumroan, P.S. Dumroan, District Buxar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amarendra Narayan, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. P. N. Shahi, AAG-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-09-2018 Heard Mr. Amarendra Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to AAG 6 for the respondentState. The present writ application has been filed for quashing the order dated 31.10.2017, passed by Respondent No.3, the Assistant Inspector General, Registration, Patna in Stamp Case No. 203 of 2017, whereby the petitioner has been directed to deposit the deficit stamp, penalty as well as the interest on delayed submission of deficit stamp. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ
Patna High Court CWJC No.3171 of 2018(2) dt.05-09-2018 2/2 application to file appeal before appropriate forum. Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the present writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with above mentioned liberty to the petitioner. If such appeal is filed along with the application for condonation of delay within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, the appellate authority will consider the same keeping in view that the petitioner was pursuing his remedy before this Court. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra/- U