Narendra Ram @ Lalendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13267 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1296 Year-2017 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== Narendra Ram @ Lalendra Ram Son of Ram Bagedu Ram Resident of Village - Shahpur, P.S.- Sasaram (M), District - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shankar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Prasad.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-07-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual court proceeding.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceeding. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sasaram (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 1296 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he, in association with co-accused person, assaulted the informant by a gun-shot on his chest as a result of which informant suffers injury. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and has not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13267 of 2021(2) dt.07-07-2021 2/2 committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He submits that from the very F.I.R., it reveals that the petitioner is not the assailant, rather allegation of firing has been alleged against another person, who was accompany with them. He further submits that petitoner was not having any fire arms in his hand and nor he shot upon the injured. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para 3 of the bail petition and has been languishing in custody since 11.09.2020. Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition. Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Sasaram (Muffasil) P.S Case No. 1296 of 2017.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) GAURAV S./- U T