Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6630/2016bail granted

Arun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-25Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6630 of 2016 (2) dt.25-02-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6630 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -714 Year- 2014 Thana -BETTIAH TOWN DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Arun Kumar son of Late Prem Yadav. Resident of village- Musapur, Naya Tola, Jurabganj, P.S.- Korha, District- Katihar.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.-7 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md.Nazir Ansari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 25-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 714 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 356, 379, 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the first information report. It is submitted that in this case he is in custody since 15.07.2015 but he has not been put on test identification parade, nothing has been recovered from his possession and merely on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and suspicion the petitioner is suffering in custody to which learned APP after going through the impugned order does not dispute and stated that chargesheet has already been submitted.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6630 of 2016 (2) dt.25-02-2016 petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 714 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T