Binod Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18379 of 2018 ====================================================== Binod Kumar Singh, Son of Late Roop Narain Singh, Resident of VillageChamuchalk, P.O.-Paimar Ghat, P.S.-Pipra, Distict- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Home Secretary Bihar Patna.

3.

The Divisional Commissioner Patna.

4.

The Collector, District, Patna 5.

The Dy. Collector Land Reforms Patna.

6.

The Sub-Division Magistrate, Masurihi District-Patna 7.

The Circle Officer, Punpun, District Patna.

8.

Officer In-Charge, Police Station Punpun, District-Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. GA-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 06-01-2020 The petition filed on 11.09.2018 is listed for hearing for the first time today before the Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief/s: " (i) For direction to respondent authority to remove the encroachment from Punpun Market as well as from PIND DAN place (under Patna District) which has been again encroached by some persons with the help of local administration despite that said encroachment were removed earlier under order of the Hon'ble High Court.

(ii) For any other relief, relief's for which the

Patna High Court CWJC No.18379 of 2018(2) dt.06-01-2020 2/2 petitioner may be found entitled."

After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the concerned respondents to consider and decide the representation, which the petitioner shall be making afresh within a period of four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the State states that upon receipt of such request, if any, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law, expeditiously and positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.

We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U