← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1625/2015bail granted

Shahnaj Praveen And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2015-01-16Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1625 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -370 Year- 2014 Thana -SUPAUL District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Shahnaj Praveen,

2. Lukhi @ Sabina Praveen,

3. Amina Khatoon,

4. Noor Jehan Khatoon, all are daughters of Md. Basir, all are resident of village-Dehda, P.S-Sonebarsa Raj, Distt.-Saharsa, at present resident of Mohalla-Belahi, Ward No.-21, P.S AND Distt.-Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2/ 16-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section(s) 302 and other allied Sections of Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the Petitioners are ladies, without going into veracity of allegation, let the Petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of `5,000/-(Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No.370 of 2014 subject to the conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1625 of 2015 (2) dt.16-01-2015 2/2 genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners.

The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (v) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) JA/- U T