Nathuni Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4665 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2013 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Nathuni Sah Son of Ramadhar Sah Resident of Village- Sisahani, P.S.- Pakarideyal, District- East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in connection with Pakarideyal P.S. Case No. 6/2013 registered for the offence punishable under sections 3/4 Explosive Substance Act and Section 17 of Criminal Law Amendment Act.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, on the date of Republic day of the year 2013, informant received an information about plantation of an explosive substance on the road towards Shekpurwa. On examination by D.S.M.D. Machine, a pressure cooker containing explosive substance was found kept under the road. Thereafter, Bomb Disposal Squad reached there and confirmed it.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4665 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2 that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. Save and except confessional statement of co-accused Haridas, nothing has come against the petitioner to show his involvement in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. After investigation, police has submitted chargesheet against the petitioner. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 15.09.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail after framing of charge, if not framed, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Pakarideyal P.S. Case No. 6 of 2013 with a condition that one of the bailors must be a family member.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ankit Kumar/- U