Lalan Prasad Yadav @ Lalan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4880 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-391 Year-2025 Thana- RAMGARHWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Lalan Prasad Yadav @ Lalan Yadav S/O Birjan Yadav @ Biraja Yadav @ Biraja Ray R/O Vill.- Laxmipur Bhathuiya, P.s.- Aadapur, District- East Chaparan, Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-02-2026 Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Pushpa Sinha, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Ramgarhwa P.S. Case No. 391 of 2025, N.D.P.S. G.R. No. 140 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii), (C) of the N.D.P.S. Act

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that from the possession of this petitioner, altogether 6.8 kg of ganja was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4880 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026 2/2 nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. He also submits that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel. Police has not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS. He also submits that the alleged amount of contraband which is recovered from the possession of this petitioner, is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.10.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge/Special Judge, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Ramgarwa P.S. Case No. 391 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T