Pramila Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3811 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2022 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
PRAMILA DEVI W/O RAMCHALITAR MANDAL R/V- GAJHARA MINAHI TOL, P.S.- LADANIA, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI 2.
RAMCHALITAR MANDAL S/O LATE SIWA MANDAL R/V- GAJHARA MINAHI TOL, P.S.- LADANIA, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI 3.
PRAMOD MANDAL @ PRAMOD KUMAR MANDAL S/O RAMCHALITAR MANDAL R/V- GAJHARA MINAHI TOL, P.S.- LADANIA, DISTRICT- MADHUBANI ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jay Prakash Sharma, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 324, 379, 354, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, petitioners are said to have abused and assaulted the informant side.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3811 of 2023(2) dt.10-02-2023 2/2 omnibus in nature. There is specific allegation against co-accused Manoj Mandal that he assaulted the informant's son Ram Pukar Mandal on his head by iron rod due to which he sustained injury. Both the parties are agnates. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. Both sides have filed cases against each other. Both the parties sustained injuries. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is admitted land dispute and case and counter case between the parties, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Ladania P.S. Case No. 197 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T