← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4650/2022bail rejected

Rana Sanjiv Kumar Singh @ Rana Sanjiv Kr. Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4650 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2021 Thana- KADWA District- Katihar ====================================================== Rana Sanjiv Kumar Singh @ Rana Sanjiv Kr. Singh Son of Arjun Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Santnagar, Ward No. 35, Police Station - Saharsa, District - Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Arjun Prasad S/O Baldev Singh R/o Ramkrishna Nagar (West) Bhagat Singh Chowk, Baldeo Path Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-11-2022 Heard both parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Kadwa P.S. Case No. 264 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Section 420 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, this petitioner along with three accused persons arrived at the place of occurrence took away machine tool BACKHOE LOADER (CAT) and also demanded cash of Rs. 13,50,000/-.

Counsel for petitioner submits that he has falsely been implicated in this case due to previous enmity. There is case and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4650 of 2022(4) dt.21-11-2022 2/2 counter case. Petitioner is employee of the informant from June to September 2018 and when he demanded his due salary, this false case has been lodge by the informant.

Counsel for informant vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that there is specific allegation of extortion against petitioner and he has got six criminal antecedents.

Considering the facts aforesaid and criminal antecedents, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner abovenamed on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T