Ranjan Kumar @ Ranjan Saw v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2954 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2019 Thana- PALIGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Ranjan Kumar @ Ranjan Saw Son of Ramjee Sao Resident of Village - Purani Saraiya, P.S.- Paliganj, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2.
27-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Paliganj P.S. Case No. 309 of 2019 registered for the offence under Section 307 & other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that there is case & counter case and both sides sustained injury. It is further submitted that injury caused to the prosecution side has been found to be simple in nature by the doctor. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as nature of accusation, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2954 of 2020(2) dt.27-02-2020 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Danapur (Patna) in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No. 309 of 2019 on the following conditions:
"(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail."
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T