Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2216 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2019 Thana- BANKA District- Banka ====================================================== ROHIT KUMAR Son of Shyam Manghi Resident of Village- Pilua, P.S.- Bounsi, Distt- Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Balram Kapri For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Informant is a police officer who has alleged that while he was checking the vehicle, he saw a motorcycle occupied by three miscreants and when they were asked to stop they tried to flee away, however, they were nabbed after chase. It has further been alleged that from possession of co-accused Chandan Yadav and Pankaj Yadav, arms and ammunition were recovered, however, from possession of the petitioner no incriminating article was recovered. Petitioner is in custody since 16.03.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2216 of 2020(2) dt.16-01-2020 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 169 of 2019 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T