Salman @ Lungra And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3331 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -347 Year- 2014 Thana -SIWAN CITY District- SIWAN ====================================================== 1.Salman @ Lungra
2. Madhwa @ Seraj .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghav Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 27-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that apart from the confessional statement of co-accused Ahsan @ Golu from whose house, the dead body was recovered and the petitioners are in jail 22.08.2014, let the petitioners Salman @ Lungra and Madhwa @ Seraj be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Siwan Town, Sarai O.P. Police Station Case No. 347/2014 subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors will be close relative of the petitioners, who
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3331 of 2015 (2) dt.27-01-2015 2/2 will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners.
The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in the address of the petitioners, ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case, and if they are, they shall not be released on bail, iii)That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the Court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding the cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled.