← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13611/2021bail granted

Saudagar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-24Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13611 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-325 Year-2020 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Saudagar Yadav S/O Mahabir Yadav R/O Village-Kharrah, P.S-Jhajha, District-Jamui.

2.

Ranjeet Yadav S/O Ghoghan Yadav R/O Village-Kharrah, P.S-Jhajha, District-Jamui.

3.

Pintu Yadav S/O Ghoghan Yadav R/O Village-Kharrah, P.S-Jhajha, DistrictJamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the informant :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Jhajha P.S. Case No. 325 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the accused-petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant and hit his son on his head due to which, the informant and his son sustained injuries.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13611 of 2021(2) dt.24-02-2022 2/2 tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. There is case and counter case between the parties. Free fight is alleged to have taken place between the parties. The injury on the side of the accused has not been explained by the prosecution. The prosecution has not come with clean hands. The delay in lodging the FIR has not been explained by the prosecution.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 325 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T