Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6269 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2023 Thana- ISUAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Pappu Kumar S/O- Sukhdev Rai R/O- Nawada, P.S.- Isuapur In The Dist. Of Saran 2.

Intesh Kumar @ Intesh @ Deepak Kumar S/O- Gautam Rai R/O- Nawada, P.S.- Isuapur In The Dist. Of Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shiv Shankar Prasad Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioners are said to have snatched the briefcase, golden chain and other articles from the hand of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that there is specific allegation against co-accused Sikandar Kumar and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6269 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 2/2 Akash Kumar. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposing the prayer for bail submit that the petitioners are also involved in the present case.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case No. 160 of 2023.

7. However, if the petitioners surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and pray for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below on the same day without being prejudiced by this order.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T