Mumtaz Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7007 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -81 Year- 2015 Thana -NASRIGANJ District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Mumtaz Alam Son of Sarfudin Ansari, resident of Village - Biseni Khurd, P.S. Nasriganj, District - Rohtas.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-04-2016 Heard Sri Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, husband of the deceased and in custody since 09.06.2015 in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case no.81/2015 (corresponding to Sessions Trial no.665/15) registered for the offence under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. However, he accepts that after commitment, charge has already been framed. Meaning thereby that the case is fixed for evidence. Keeping in view the fact that trial has already commenced, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7007 of 2016 (3) dt.08-04-2016 2/2 stands dismissed.

However, since the trial has already commenced, while dismissing the bail petition, it is desirable to observe that the learned trial judge may take appropriate steps, so that the case may come to its logical end without unnecessary delay. (Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U