Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10509/2016rejected

Laxman Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2016-04-26Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10509 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -115 Year- 2015 Thana -CHARIABARIYARPUR DistrictBEGUSARAI ====================================================== Laxman Sahni, Son of Hare Kishun Sahni, resident of Village- Sripur, P.S.- Cheria Bariarpur, District- Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md.Ansarul Haque(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence punishable under Section 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, from possession of the petitioner one loaded country made pistol besides two other cartridges were recovered and the petitioner has got criminal antecedent and as he is involved in other cases under Arms Act.

Submission is of false implication that in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded as the Court is vacant which is evident from the report dated 16.03.2016 and petitioner is suffering in custody since 31.07.2015.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10509 of 2016 (3) dt.26-04-2016 2/2 Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail by pointing out other cases under Arms Act going on against the petitioner and criminal antecedent also.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, at present I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly his such prayer stands rejected in connection with Cheria Bariarpur P.S. case no. 115/2015 pending in the court of the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Manjhaul, Begusarai. However, let the trial be expedited and concluded preferably within six months after receipt or production of the copy of the order failing which if the petitioner at no fault may renew his prayer for bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Vinita/- U T