Binod Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19379 of 2018 ====================================================== Binod Kumar Chaudhary S/o Shri Vimal Chandra Chaudhary R/o VillageManihari (Dharmshala-Road) P.S.Manihari, District-Katihar and Presently Working as Treasury Guard in the Office of Executive Engineer at Work SubDivision Kesaria and Rural Works Department, Work Division Chakia, East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Engineer in Chief, Cum-Additional Secretary Cum Commissioner, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Engineer in Chief, cum-Additional Commissioner Cum Special Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6.

The Chief Engineer-3, Rural Works Department, Patna. 7.

The Chief Engineer, Ganga Pul Pariyojana Upbhag, Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.

8.

The Superintending Engineer, Ganga Pul, Anchal No.2, Road Construction Department, Bhagalpur.

9.

The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Anchal, Motihari, East-Champaran.

10.

The Technical Advisor, Ganga Pul, Anchal No.2, Road Construction Department, Bhagalpur.

11.

The Executive Engineer, National Highway Road Division, Madhepura 12.

The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Chakia, East-Champaran.

13.

The Executive Engineer, Vigilance Division-3 (Hqrs) Rural Works Department, Patna.

14.

The Chief Engineer-4 H.Q. Rural Work Department, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhubneshwar Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 10-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears for the State.

Patna High Court CWJC No.19379 of 2018(2) dt.10-06-2019 2/2 After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner finding that the State respondents have come out with Memo No. 1387 dated 04.12.2017 as contained in Annexure 'C' to their counter affidavit available on the record, submits that he may be granted permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to challenge the order as contained in Annexure 'C' to the counter affidavit.

As prayed, let this writ application be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

This writ application stands disposed off accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U