Mantu Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3415 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2021 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
MANTU RAY Son of Late Nanda Ray Resident of Village - Diwan Tok, P.S. - Ganga Bridge, District - Vaishali.
2.
Niraj Kumar S/o Bhuneshwar Ray Resident of Village - Diwan Tok, P.S. - Ganga Bridge, District - Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Priyesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sucheta Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 14-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. It is a case of recovery of about 10 liters of country made liquor from the banana orchard.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that they have no concern with the seized liquor and no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious or constructive possession of the petitioners.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3415 of 2022(2) dt.14-06-2022 2/2 Petitioners have not been apprehended at the spot. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.
Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Excise Court, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No. 163 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T