Mahesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8056 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2021 Thana- NIMCHAKBATHANI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Mahesh Yadav S/o Bachan Yadav @ Vashan Yadav R/o vill - Sindha Par, P.S. - Neemchak Bathani, Distt.- Gaya 2.

Rajosh Yadav @ Rashosh Kumar S/o Mahesh Prasad @ Mahesh Yadav R/o vill - Sindha Par, P.S. - Neemchak Bathani, Distt.- Gaya 3.

Rajin Yadav @ Rajeev Kumar S/o Mahesh Prasad @ Mahesh Yadav R/o vill - Sindha Par, P.S. - Neemchak Bathani, Distt.- Gaya 4.

Lalu Yadav @ Lalu Kumar S/o Mahesh Prasad @ Mahesh Yadav R/o vill - Sindha Par, P.S. - Neemchak Bathani, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brijmohan Das, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 337, 308, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons came and assaulted him by means of lathi, rod and brick. It is next submitted that from perusal of allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8056 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 2/2 allegation of assault is not specific and the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature and chargesheet has been submitted, as such, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioners to jail, when police during the course of investigation never felt the need of arresting them.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court, where the case is pending / successor Court, in connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No. 86 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Shahnawaz/- U T