← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13996/2021bail rejected

Rambriksh Bharti @ Briksh Bharti @ Briksh Bhuiyan v. The State Of Bihar

2021-08-04Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13996 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2019 Thana- SUHAIL District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

RAMBRIKSH BHARTI @ BRIKSH BHARTI @ BRIKSH BHUIYAN S/o Tetar Bharti 2.

Chhotu Bharti @ Chhotu Kumar S/o Rambriksh Bharti @ Briksh Bharti @ Briksh Bhuiyan Both residents of Village- Salaiya, P.S.- Sohail, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravindra Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 04-08-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the F.I.R., the father-in-law and the brother-in-law of the sister of the informant assaulted the mother of the informant as a result of which, she died. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the allegations as levelled in the F.I.R. are false and concocted. The petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case because of property dispute between them and the other

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13996 of 2021(3) dt.04-08-2021 2/2 son of petitioner no.1 i.e. the son-in-law of the deceased. The statement of the daughter of the deceased has been recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. The deceased died in a manner other than what has been narrated in the F.I.R. The petitioners are in custody since 20.6.2019 and there is no chance of the trial concluding in the near future. They have no criminal antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the direct allegation against the petitioners which is supported by the daughter-in-law of petitioner no.1 as also by the post-mortem report, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail and the application is rejected.

Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T