← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4935/2019dismissed

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Verma @ Sanjay Kr. Verma v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-13Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4935 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2017 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== SANJAY KUMAR @ SANJAY VERMA @ SANJAY KR. VERMA Nand Kishore Verma Resident of Panchabati Hat Sabour, P.S.- Sabour, District - Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr.Manindra Kishore Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-05-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Sabour P.S. Case No. 204 of 2017, disclosing offences under Sections 498(A), 341, 323, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

This case was earlier referred to Mediation Centre vide order dated 12.03.2019 and report of Mediator is available on record, which disclosed that despite of best efforts, parties failed to resolve their disputes through the process of mediation. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has tried to reconcile the dispute but the opposite party no. 2 is not ready to reconcile the dispute and petitioner is ready to give maintenance.

Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no. 2. They have opposed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4935 of 2019(4) dt.13-05-2019 2/2 the prayer for bail on the ground that after mediation, the petitioner had taken the opposite party no. 2 with himself to Mumbai but only after a month, he left her and also did not appear in the mediation center.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances as well as the conduct of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner rather petitioner, if so desire, may move before the court below and make prayer for regular bail and if any such application is filed, the court below will dispose of the same on the merit of the case, without being prejudiced by this order. This application is, accordingly, dismissed . (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T