Anwar Ali v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2728 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-533 Year-2025 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Anwar Ali S/O Imamuddin R/O Village- Bharpura, P.S.-Sonpur, DistrictSaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mohammad Sufyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 533 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. On the fateful day, the petitioner along with three other persons are said to have entered into the house of the informant and started abusing and assaulting. It is specifically alleged that this petitioner along with co-accused Akhtar Ali attacked the informant by means of iron rod and stick due to which he sustained serious injury. There is further allegation against other accused persons of causing assault and snatching valuables.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2728 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that as per the FIR the alleged occurrence took place in the morning of 31.05.2025 but the present FIR came to be instituted on 02.06.2025 but there is no plausible explanation for delay. The entire case falls to the ground for the simple reason that the doctor in course of examination found no visible injury, except the pain in lower abdomen and backache to the informant and thus has opined the injury as simple. There is counter version of the present case being Sonpur P.S. Case No. 534 of 2025 instituted against the informant and others. The petitioner is a man of fair antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the court.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioner has actively participated in the crime and brutally assaulted the informant.
6. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocates for the respective parties and taking note of the factum of case and counter case, coupled with the simple injury as well as the fair antecedent, let the petitioner abovenamed be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2728 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 533 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/- U T