Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23032/2016rejected

Md. Tauhid Khan @ Tauhid Khan v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-07Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23032 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -139 Year- 2015 Thana -DURGAWATI District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== Md. Tauhid Khan @ Tauhid Khan, S/o Liyakat Khan Resident of village - Dumari, P.S. Durgawati, District - Kaimur at Bhabua .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sangita Sharma (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 07-09-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 01.03.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 52693 of 2015, on the ground that now the stage of the case has been changed as charges have been framed and the petitioner is suffering in custody since 03.08.2015. He is not the assailant of the deceased and, as such, he deserves sympathetic consideration.

Learned APP duly assisted by the learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that without change of stage this criminal miscellaneous was filed and charges have been framed during pendency of this Criminal

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23032 of 2016 (6) dt.07-09-2016 2/2 Miscellaneous and further again the petitioner has been involved in another criminal case when he was in jail custody. In the facts and circumstances stated above, at present I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected.

However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and to conclude the same preferably within four months after taking the same on priority basis, failing which if the petitioner at no fault, may be renew the prayer for bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T